Ph.D.-portal
The forms ‘Evaluation Master Thesis‘ and ‘Evaluation PhD Thesis‘ serve as guidelines and are available for download from our homepage. Should you prefer to write the evaluation yourself, please see the evaluation criteria listed below. This list serves as a guideline and is not exhaustive. Some criteria are subject-specific and, thus · The assessment committee assesses the academic quality of the PhD dissertation in question. Prior to the submission of a dissertation, the main supervisor and the management of the Graduate School of Health have ensured that the PhD process has been satisfactory and that all formal requirements have been met The outcome of your thesis will determine whether or not you pass your PhD viva. A thesis can be marked as a pass, in need of corrections, resubmission, downgrade or fail. Though you should aim for a pass, most students will be required to make some form of
Study portals
Criteria for evaluating Masters and Doctoral theses Dr Ivan Lowe. March Short definition of a Masters thesis 1. A masters thesis is an initiation into serious experimental research. A good thesis shows that the writer can produce an extended piece of work, in perfect English, which respects the standards of form and blogger.com Size: 99KB · The assessment committee assesses the academic quality of the PhD dissertation in question. Prior to the submission of a dissertation, the main supervisor and the management of the Graduate School of Health have ensured that the PhD process has been satisfactory and that all formal requirements have been met The dissertation must be logically organised, the language must be clearly articulated and the graphic layout must be clean and easy to follow. The text must be consistent and logical, focusing on the essential. The argument must be made logically. The author must show proof of critical thinking, originality and independence
Although different examiners will adopt different methods of examining the thesis and for conducting the oral examination, there are some general criteria for evaluating PhD theses that may be useful for students to bear in mind. 1. PRESENTATION AND CLARITY o The reader should be able to read the text without difficulty · The assessment committee assesses the academic quality of the PhD dissertation in question. Prior to the submission of a dissertation, the main supervisor and the management of the Graduate School of Health have ensured that the PhD process has been satisfactory and that all formal requirements have been met The forms ‘Evaluation Master Thesis‘ and ‘Evaluation PhD Thesis‘ serve as guidelines and are available for download from our homepage. Should you prefer to write the evaluation yourself, please see the evaluation criteria listed below. This list serves as a guideline and is not exhaustive. Some criteria are subject-specific and, thus
graduate school, and the program and laboratory that the candidate belongs to and the following criteria. A title clearly identifies the topic of the thesis. A introduction (background, objective), methods, results, discussion, figures, tables and references Please check each evaluation criteria that you feel are appropriate within each attribute category) Attribute for ORAL Does Not Meet Expectations Provide a short explanation for each attribute that you select in this category. Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Overall quality of presentation Doctoral Program in Computer Science Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia Universidade NOVA de Lisboa Thesis Plan Evaluation Form Quality of the state of the art survey (weight%)
Criteria for evaluating Masters and Doctoral theses Dr Ivan Lowe. March Short definition of a Masters thesis 1. A masters thesis is an initiation into serious experimental research. A good thesis shows that the writer can produce an extended piece of work, in perfect English, which respects the standards of form and blogger.com Size: 99KB The forms ‘Evaluation Master Thesis‘ and ‘Evaluation PhD Thesis‘ serve as guidelines and are available for download from our homepage. Should you prefer to write the evaluation yourself, please see the evaluation criteria listed below. This list serves as a guideline and is not exhaustive. Some criteria are subject-specific and, thus The dissertation must be logically organised, the language must be clearly articulated and the graphic layout must be clean and easy to follow. The text must be consistent and logical, focusing on the essential. The argument must be made logically. The author must show proof of critical thinking, originality and independence
No comments:
Post a Comment